Hemoadsorption in Emerging Economies: Translating Therapeutic Promise into Clinical Practice
pdf

Keywords

Emerging economies
hemoadsorption
resource-limited settings
sepsis
septic shock

Abstract

Critical illness and sepsis place a substantial burden on emerging healthcare systems, where delayed presentation and referral, limited diagnostic and monitoring capacity, a high burden of antimicrobial resistance, variable intensive care and extracorporeal infrastructure, workforce shortages, and substantial out-of-pocket healthcare costs may complicate the management of septic shock. Prompt antimicrobial therapy, source control, hemodynamic stabilization, and organ support remain the foundation of care; however, some patients develop persistent shock and progressive organ dysfunction despite optimized conventional treatment. In this context, hemoadsorption has emerged as a potential adjunctive therapy aimed at modifying components of the dysregulated host response.
Despite its biological rationale and effects on circulating inflammatory mediators, improvements in surrogate markers have not consistently translated into better patient outcomes. Important uncertainties regarding optimal patient selection, timing,
and treatment intensity therefore remain. A pragmatic approach in emerging economies should prioritize carefully selected patients with persistent vasopressor- dependent shock, progressive organ dysfunction and a clinically relevant hyperinflammatory phenotype despite optimized standard care. Treatment decisions should be guided primarily by clinical presentation and trajectory rather than rigid
time thresholds or reliance on a single biomarker. Multidisciplinary assessment, transparent communication regarding potential benefits, limitations, uncertainties, risks, and financial implications, and predefined clinically meaningful endpoints are essential. Serial reassessment should guide treatment continuation, modification, or cessation. Prospective documentation of outcomes, complications, resource utilization, and affordability is needed to strengthen locally relevant evidence. Ultimately, the value of hemoadsorption in emerging economies will depend on its appropriate, equitable, and context-sensitive integration into existing healthcare systems.

https://doi.org/10.67570/jnsccm.v4i3.163
pdf

References

Alqarni RS, Alobeidi NA, Alruways F, et al. Multidisciplinary Management of Critically Ill Patients in Acute Care Settings-An Updated Review. Rev Diabet Stud. 2024;20.

Bartlett ES, Lim A, Kivlehan S, et al. Critical care delivery across health care systems in low-income and low-middle-income country settings: A systematic review. J Glob Health. 2023;13:04141.

Coates MM, Ezzati M, Robles Aguilar G, et al. Burden of disease among the world’s poorest billion people: An expert-informed secondary analysis of Global Burden of Disease estimates. Devleesschauwer B, ed. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(8):e0253073.

Kimera ZI, Mtebe M, Mbugi E, Matee MIN. Antimicrobial resistance in low and middle income countries driven by governance policy and One Health strategies for effective action. Discov Public Health. 2026;23(1):753.

Lewnard JA, Charani E, Gleason A, et al. Burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in low-income and middle-income countries avertible by existing interventions: an evidence review and modelling analysis. Lancet. 2024;403(10442):2439-2454.

Dünser MW, Festic E, Dondorp A, et al. Recommendations for sepsis management in resource-limited settings. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(4):557-574.

Watson RS, Carrol ED, Carter MJ, Kissoon N, Ranjit S, Schlapbach LJ. The burden and contemporary epidemiology of sepsis in children. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024;8(9):670-681.

Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(11):1181-1247.

Prescott HC, Antonelli M, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2026. Intensive Care Med. 2026;52(5):863-936.

Albrecht F, Schunk S, Fuchs M, et al. Rapid and Effective Elimination of Myoglobin with CytoSorb® Hemoadsorber in Patients with Severe Rhabdomyolysis. Blood Purif. 2024;53(2):88-95.

Dhokia VD, Madhavan D, Austin A, Morris CG. Novel use of Cytosorb haemadsorption to provide biochemical control in liver impairment. J Intensive Care Soc. 2019;20(2):174-181.

Jan sen A, Waalders NJB, van Lier DPT, Kox M, Pickkers P. CytoSorb hemoperfusion markedly attenuates circulating cytokine concentrations during systemic inflammation in humans in vivo. Crit Care. 2023;27(1):117.

Saldaña-Gastulo JJC, Llamas-Barbarán MDR, Coronel-Chucos LG, Hurtado-Roca Y. Cytokine hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Sci. 2023;35(2):217-225. [PubMed | Google Scholar | DOI]

Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801.

Mehta Y, Ansari AS, Mandal AK, et al. Systematic review with expert consensus on use of extracorporeal hemoadsorption in septic shock: An Indian perspective. World J Crit Care Med. 2024;13(1):89026.

Mitzner S, Kogelmann K, Ince C, Molnár Z, Ferrer R, Nierhaus A. Adjunctive Hemoadsorption Therapy with CytoSorb in Patients with Septic/Vasoplegic Shock: A Best Practice Consensus Statement. J Clin Med. 2023;12(23):7199.

Davis K, Limato R, Monga M, et al. Antimicrobial resistance, equity and justice in low-and middle-income countries: an intersectional critical interpretive synthesis. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):9078.

Gigante V, Murtagh M, Bachmann TT, et al. Diagnostics for priority bacterial pathogens: global gaps and research needs for curbing antimicrobial resistance in low-resource settings. Lancet Microbe. 2026;7(7):101385.

Jinks T, Subramaniam S, Bassetti M, et al. Opportunities to Enhance Diagnostic Testing and Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Qualitative Multinational Survey of Healthcare Professionals. Infect Dis Ther. 2024;13(7):1621-1637.

Kaimba S, Umar E. Factors associated with delayed referrals of patients with sepsis from

primary to tertiary healthcare in Blantyre, Malawi: a qualitative study. BMC Prim Care. 2025;26(1):13.

Diaz JV, Riviello ED, Papali A, Adhikari NKJ, Ferreira JC. Global Critical Care: Moving Forward in Resource-Limited Settings. Ann Glob Health. 2019;85(1):3.

Bellomo R, Ankawi G, Bagshaw SM, et al. Hemoadsorption: consensus report of the 30th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroup. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024;39(12):1945-1964.

Annigeri RA, Ostermann M, Tolwani A, et al. Renal Support for Acute Kidney Injury in the Developing World. Kidney Int Rep. 2017;2(4):559-578.

Mani RK, Bhatnagar S, Butola S, et al. Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine and Indian Association of Palliative Care Expert Consensus and Position Statements for End-of-life and Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024;28(3):200-250.

Paul R, Sathe P, Kumar S, Prasad S, Aleem M, Sakhalvalkar P. Multicentered prospective investigator initiated study to evaluate the clinical outcomes with extracorporeal cytokine adsorption device (CytoSorb®) in patients with sepsis and septic shock. World J Crit Care Med. 2021;10(1):22-34.

Kon AA, Davidson JE, Morrison W, et al. Shared Decision Making in ICUs: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(1):188-201.

Mehta Y, Mehta C, Kumar A, et al. Experience with hemoadsorption (CytoSorb®) in the management of septic shock patients. World J Crit Care Med. 2020;9(1):1-12.

Singh YP, Chhabra SC, Lashkari K, et al. Hemoadsorption by extracorporeal cytokine adsorption therapy (CytoSorb®) in the management of septic shock: A retrospective observational study. Int J Artif Organs. 2020;43(6):372-378.

Heymann M, Schorer R, Putzu A. Mortality and adverse events of hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022;66(9):1037-1050.

Shah MS, Sharma VV, Patel SJ, Ansari AS. Retrospective evaluation of efficacy of CytoSorb® therapy in septic shock patients in a tertiary care intensive care unit. World J Crit Care Med. 2025;14(4):105600.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.