From Concept to Implementation: Establishing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Services in Resource-limited Settings
pdf

Keywords

Critical care transport
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
regionalization
resource-limited settings
telemedicine

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can provide temporary respiratory or circulatory support for selected patients with otherwise refractory organ failure. Access, however, remains concentrated in experienced tertiary centres. Distance, limited critical-
care infrastructure, workforce shortages and high treatment costs can delay assessment and transfer for patients living outside major urban areas. This narrative review examines practical and ethical approaches to developing ECMO access in resource-limited and geographically remote settings, with emphasis on regional coordination rather than indiscriminate expansion of stand-alone services. The manuscript synthesizes selected clinical trials, professional guidance, registry-based literature and implementation-focused publications relevant to ECMO selection, service organisation, transport, training, safety and affordability. It is a narrative review and should not be interpreted as a systematic review. A hub-and-spoke pathway can support early recognition and consultation at peripheral
hospitals while concentrating complex cannulation, management and rescue capability in experienced centres. Mobile retrieval and tele-ECMO may extend access, but require trained teams, reliable transport systems, clear governance and predefined escalation pathways. Cost estimates and claims of large savings are highly context-dependent and should not be generalised without local economic evaluation. Patient selection, informed consent, transparent resource allocation, adverse-event review and prospective outcome reporting are essential. ECMO access beyond major cities is most defensible when built around regional networks, timely referral, competent multidisciplinary teams and auditable outcomes. The priority should be to strengthen safe pathways to established expertise; a local ECMO service should be introduced only when minimum clinical, logistical and financial safeguards can be
sustained.

https://doi.org/10.67570/jnsccm.v4i3.169
pdf

References

Brodie D, Slutsky AS, Combes A. Extracorporeal life support for adults with respiratory failure and related indications: a review. JAMA. 2019;322(6):557-568.

Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(21):1965-1975.

Munshi L, Walkey A, Goligher E, Pham T, Uleryk EM, Fan E. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(2):163-172.

Tonna JE, Abrams D, Brodie D, et al. Management of adult patients supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO): guideline from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). ASAIO J. 2021;67(6):601-610.

Badulak J, Antonini MV, Stead CM, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19: updated 2021 guidelines from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. ASAIO J. 2021;67(5):485-495.

Ramanathan K, Antognini D, Combes A, et al. Planning and provision of ECMO services for severe ARDS during the COVID-19 pandemic and other outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(5):518-526.

Fletcher-Sandersjöö A, Frenckner B, Broman M. A single-center experience of 900 interhospital transports on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107(1):119-127.

Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, et al. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9698):1351-1363.

Labib A, August E, Agerstrand C, et al. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization guideline for transport and retrieval of adult and pediatric patients with ECMO support. ASAIO J. 2022;68(4):447-455.

Combes A, Brodie D, Bartlett R, et al. Position paper for the organization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation programs for acute respiratory failure in adult patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(5):488-496.

Abrams D, Garan AR, Abdelbary A, et al. Position paper for the organization of ECMO programs for cardiac failure in adults. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(6):717-729.

McMichael ABV, Ryerson LM, Ratano D, et al. 2021 ELSO adult and pediatric anticoagulation guidelines. ASAIO J. 2022;68(3):303-310.

Barbaro RP, MacLaren G, Boonstra PS, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in COVID-19: an international cohort study of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. Lancet. 2020;396(10257):1071-1078.

Barbaro RP, MacLaren G, Boonstra PS, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19: evolving outcomes from the international Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. Lancet. 2021;398(10307):1230-1238.

Ramanathan K. Ethical challenges of adult ECMO. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;37(Suppl 2):303-308.

Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. ELSO 2025 narrative guideline on ECMO training and continuing education. ELSO; 2025.

Knudson KA, Gustafson CM, Sadler LS, et al. Long-term health-related quality of life of adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): an integrative review. Heart Lung. 2019;48(6):538-552.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.